Site Map Icon
RSS Feed icon
 
 
 
Garrity Warning Form
POLICE OFFICERS'
Important Links
EPMPOA Memorial Hall - Facebook
AETNA Insurance
CLEAT
CLEAT Benefits
CLEAT Dental/Vision
Dentemax
Express Scripts (Formerly MEDCO Pharmacy)
WellConnect - EAP / Stress Management
Prudential Retirement - Deferred Comp.
El Paso Fire/Police Pension
EP Fire/Police Pension Fund - Facebook Page
Agency Web
CourtNotify
City/EPPD Webmail
El Paso Police Department
EPPD Learning Center
History of El Paso Police Dept.
EP County Sheriff's Officers Assn.
El Paso Firefighter's Association
NAPO
City of El Paso
County of El Paso
State of Texas
Officer Down Memorial
Peace Officer's Memorial Foundation
Fallen Officer Project
TCOLE
Police Pay
Union Plus
Calibre Press
American Police Beat Magazine
PubSecAlliance
LawOfficer.Com
City of El Paso Online Crime Reporting Forms
Texas DPS Driver's Crash Report (Blue Form)
Graffiti Removal
City of El Paso Ordinance Search
Past Practice and Contract Negotiations
Updated On: Oct 08, 2012

Can A Past Practice Change A Contract?

March 30th, 2012

A topic that finds the opinion of arbitrators fractured is whether a past practice can change the clear terms of a contract.

The most often cited reference works on past practice are a 1961 law review article by Arbitrator Richard Mittenthal, and the basic treatise on labor arbitration, How Arbitration Works by Frank and Edna Elkouri. Mittenthal’s article, titled “Past Practice and the Administration of Collective Bargaining Agreements,” suggested there were five elements to a binding past practice:

Clarity and consistency.Mittenthal wrote that “a course of conduct which is vague and ambiguous or which has been contradicted as often as it has been followed can hardly qualify as a practice.”

Longevity and Repetition.Mittenthal observed that “a period of time has to elapse during which a consistent pattern of behavior emerges. Just how frequently and over how long a period something must be done before it can be characterized as a practice is a matter of good judgment for which no formula can be devised.”

Acceptability.The third of the elements of a past practice is that employees and the employer “must have knowledge of the particular conduct and must regard it as the correct and customary means of handling a situation. Such acceptability may frequently be implied from long acquiescence in a known course of conduct.”

The Underlying Circumstances.As Mittenthal described, “a practice is no broader than the circumstances out of which it has arisen, although its scope can always be enlarged in the day-to-day administration of the contract.

Mutuality.The last of Mittenthal’s requirements was that a past practice be mutual: “Some practices are the product, either in their inception or in their application, of a joint understanding; others develop from choices made by the employer in the exercise of its managerial discretion without any intention of a future commitment.”

Elkouri and Elkouri use a similar definition of past practice, and suggest that a majority of arbitrators believe that a past practice can even “fill in the gap” in an area not covered by the contract. As to the next level of use – whether a past practice can actually contradict an unambiguous clause in a contract – the Elkouris note that arbitrators are in disagreement.

A majority of arbitrators believe that while a past practice can help explain a contract, or can fill in the gaps where a contract is silent, it cannot contradict the explicit terms of a contract. However, a minority of arbitrators believe that if a past practice is longstanding enough, and has spanned the repeated renegotiation of the contract, the past practice can actually amend clear and unambiguous contract terms. As phrased by one arbitrator following the minority rule, “day-to-day actions, when they run counter to the plain meaning of the contract’s words, evidence an intent to substitute that which they actually do for that which they said in writing they would do.” City of Palo Alto, 107 LA 494 (Riker 1996).

An arbitrator following the majority rule recently decided a case involving the Hampshire County, Massachusetts Sheriff’s Department. The contract between the County and the National Correctional Employees Union allowed the employer to require employees to provide medical verification of sick leave use when they used more than 15 days of sick leave in a calendar year. Notwithstanding the clear contract language, on 299 occasions over 23 years, the Department required medical verification after ten days of sick leave use, not 15. The Union failed to challenge any of the 299 ten-day letters.

When the employer issued its 300th ten-day letter, the Union challenged the letter in arbitration. The employer argued that the long-standing past practice effectively amended the contract.

The Arbitrator sided with the Union, finding that the “Union’s right to grieve was not diminished by its failure to exercise that right. While the Union neglected to grieve ten-day letters in the past, its right to do so was not in conflict with the specific terms of the agreement.”

Hampshire County Sheriff’s Department, LAIG ¶6984 (O’Brien 2012).


Member Login
Username:

Password:


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up

Forgot Your Login?
October 22, 2014
<< October 2014 >>
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Upcoming Events
Early Voting Period for Nov. 4th General Election
Oct 22, 2014
Various Locations throughout El Paso County. See attached
Pioneer Group Meeting for LEO's in Sobriety
Oct 27, 2014
747 E. San Antonio Ave., #103
Pioneer Group Meeting for LEO's in Sobriety
Nov 03, 2014
747 E. San Antonio Ave., #103
General Election
Nov 04, 2014
Voting Locations Countywide
Pioneer Group Meeting for LEO's in Sobriety
Nov 10, 2014
747 E. San Antonio Ave., #103
Action Center

EPMPOA Approved Provider

EPMPOA Approved Provider

EPMPOA Approved Provider

EPMPOA Approved Provider

EPMPOA Approved Provider
Follow Us!
Facebook icon Twitter icon
 
 
El Paso Municipal Police Officers' Association
Copyright © 2014, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™

544851 hits since Apr 11, 2011
Visit Unions-America.com!

Top of Page image